RL Vision Knowledge Base
Support questions and answers for software by RL Vision.
Note: This is an archived discussion. Any bug, problem or suggestion mentioned here is likely to have been fixed since it was written.
Subject: Re: Flash renamer-idea/sugestion-redating basis Exif Digitized date
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:53:30 +0100Hi,
I see your problem. If you use the "format" function you have the ability to choose exactly which tag to get. But not in the "set date" function.
It was tricky to do this function, because it has to be "smart" since not all images have all date tags filled.
Based on your image it seems to me that ACDSee has modified the image and also changed the date tag. (It shouldn't do that if you ask me.)
I will think about adding a fix to this problem. If so, it will probably be a "tweak" located in the FlashRen.ini file, since this seems to be a minor problem that most people will not encounter.
// Dan
----- Original Message -----
From: wulffra
To: RL
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 7:24 PM
Subject: RE: Flash Renamer-idea/sugestion-redating basis Exif Digitized date
ref my earlier e-mail, here an example Dan
Van: wulffra [mailto:*****@*****]
Verzonden: dinsdag 28 november 2006 19:20
Aan: 'RL Vision'
Onderwerp: Flash Renamer-idea/sugestion-redating basis Exif Digitized date
Hello Dan,
Feature request: within renaming date there is an option to get date+time from jpg image exif tag.
Please wud it be possible to add: date-time digitized ??
This is basically THE original date of the photo taken.
Below you will find details from any random photo (Exif-details show in ACDSee).
It is possible that the first date (1) mentioned below - basis for yr Exif redating- is different from
the date digitized.
I found out after redating a few hundred jpg's basis Exif-tag and noticed that roughly 10-20
had a different date and not the exif-digitized date.
thanks and regards,
Marcel.
I see your problem. If you use the "format" function you have the ability to choose exactly which tag to get. But not in the "set date" function.
It was tricky to do this function, because it has to be "smart" since not all images have all date tags filled.
Based on your image it seems to me that ACDSee has modified the image and also changed the date tag. (It shouldn't do that if you ask me.)
I will think about adding a fix to this problem. If so, it will probably be a "tweak" located in the FlashRen.ini file, since this seems to be a minor problem that most people will not encounter.
// Dan
----- Original Message -----
From: wulffra
To: RL
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 7:24 PM
Subject: RE: Flash Renamer-idea/sugestion-redating basis Exif Digitized date
ref my earlier e-mail, here an example Dan
Van: wulffra [mailto:*****@*****]
Verzonden: dinsdag 28 november 2006 19:20
Aan: 'RL Vision'
Onderwerp: Flash Renamer-idea/sugestion-redating basis Exif Digitized date
Hello Dan,
Feature request: within renaming date there is an option to get date+time from jpg image exif tag.
Please wud it be possible to add: date-time digitized ??
This is basically THE original date of the photo taken.
Below you will find details from any random photo (Exif-details show in ACDSee).
It is possible that the first date (1) mentioned below - basis for yr Exif redating- is different from
the date digitized.
I found out after redating a few hundred jpg's basis Exif-tag and noticed that roughly 10-20
had a different date and not the exif-digitized date.
thanks and regards,
Marcel.
