RL Vision Knowledge Base
Support questions and answers for software by RL Vision.
Note: This is an archived discussion. Any bug, problem or suggestion mentioned here is likely to have been fixed since it was written.
Subject: Re: Renamer
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:54:10 +0100Hi,
I'm afraid I don't understand exactly what you mean. It might be a bug. Can you send me a screenshot?
// Dan
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael
To: *****@*****
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 7:10 PM
Subject: Renamer
Hello at RL
I am using renamer alot and have been very happy about the way things worked.
Now I have upgraded to the 5 version and one thing that bugs me really much, is the way you have designed the tab function. When ever I click any tab, a 3.ed tab row is presented. even if I don't need it. Maybe a bit more old-school way of having tab rows, which are not visible, would be better.
Another way could be to just have one tab row visible at all times and above that line have a tab row selector. Perhabs via a simple number select drop-down box. That way you can have 4000 tab rows, if it was needed. You could even label the rows and group the functions.
Tell me what you think.
Best regards, Michael
I'm afraid I don't understand exactly what you mean. It might be a bug. Can you send me a screenshot?
// Dan
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael
To: *****@*****
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 7:10 PM
Subject: Renamer
Hello at RL
I am using renamer alot and have been very happy about the way things worked.
Now I have upgraded to the 5 version and one thing that bugs me really much, is the way you have designed the tab function. When ever I click any tab, a 3.ed tab row is presented. even if I don't need it. Maybe a bit more old-school way of having tab rows, which are not visible, would be better.
Another way could be to just have one tab row visible at all times and above that line have a tab row selector. Perhabs via a simple number select drop-down box. That way you can have 4000 tab rows, if it was needed. You could even label the rows and group the functions.
Tell me what you think.
Best regards, Michael
